From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Araujo

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 14, 2006
171 F. App'x 71 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted March 8, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Ronald G. Johnson, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Georgia K. McMillen, Esq., Wailuku, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, Susan Oki Mollway, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-00269-SOM.

Before: CANBY, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Keoki Jonathan Kekua Araujo appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for possession of an unregistered weapon in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Araujo has filed a brief

Page 72.

stating that she finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Araujo

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 14, 2006
171 F. App'x 71 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Araujo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Keoki Jonathan Kekua…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 14, 2006

Citations

171 F. App'x 71 (9th Cir. 2006)