From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Approximately $35,900.00 in U.S. Currency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2012
1:12-CV-00254-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-CV-00254-LJO-SKO

07-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. APPROXIMATELY $35,900.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, APPROXIMATELY $5,500.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, APPROXIMATELY $3,127.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, and APPROXIMATELY $5,772.08 IN US. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM UNION BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 1540018207, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HEATHER MARDEL JONES Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for United States


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HEATHER MARDEL JONES

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for United States

STIPULATION TO STAY

PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER

The United States of America and Claimants Mark Bagdasarian and Maureen Bagdasarian, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that a stay is necessary in the above-entitled action and request the Court enter an order staying proceedings due to the on-going criminal prosecution United States v. Bagdasarian et al, 1:11-CR-00352-LJO-SKO.

The stay is requested pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1) and (g)(2). The United States contends that the defendant assets were proceeds of, involved in, or facilitated the violations alleged in the Superceding Criminal Indictment (See 1:11-CR-00352-LJO-SKO Doc # 42).

A stay is warranted because if discovery proceeds at this time in the civil in rem case, Claimants would be entitled to depose, among others, the agents and deputies involved with this investigation. Allowing depositions of the law enforcement officers at this stage of the criminal investigation could adversely affect the ability of the federal authorities to effectively pursue the related criminal prosecution.

Likewise, a stay is warranted because Claimant Mark Bagdasarian is a Defendant in the related criminal prosecution, has standing to assert a claim in the civil in rem forfeiture proceeding, and continuation of the forfeiture proceeding will burden the right of Claimant Mark Bagdasarian against self-incrimination in the related criminal prosecution.

As such, the parties recognize that proceeding with the civil in rem action at this time could have adverse effects on the underlying criminal prosecution and/or upon the Claimants' ability to prove their claim to the property and to assert any defenses to forfeiture.

For these reasons, the parties jointly request that this matter be stayed pending resolution of the related criminal prosecution. THEREFORE, the parties to this action stipulate and request as follows: 1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1) and (g)(2), this action be stayed due to the pending related criminal prosecution; 2. All presently scheduled court dates be vacated; and, 3. The parties are to promptly notify the Court upon resolution of the pending criminal prosecution.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

____________________________

HEATHER MARDEL JONES

Assistant United States Attorney

____________________________

ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI

NICHOLAS CAPOZZI

Attorneys for Claimants

Mark Bagdasarian and

Maureen Bagdasarian

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Approximately $35,900.00 in U.S. Currency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2012
1:12-CV-00254-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Approximately $35,900.00 in U.S. Currency

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. APPROXIMATELY $35,900.00 IN U.S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

1:12-CV-00254-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)