From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Antunez-Pineda

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jan 11, 2016
628 F. App'x 738 (11th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-12110

01-11-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAMIRO ANTUNEZ-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00272-WSD-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Before HULL, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Colette Resnik Steel, appointed counsel for Ramiro Antunez-Pineda, in this direct criminal appeal, as moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Antunez-Pineda's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Antunez-Pineda

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jan 11, 2016
628 F. App'x 738 (11th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Antunez-Pineda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAMIRO ANTUNEZ-PINEDA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 11, 2016

Citations

628 F. App'x 738 (11th Cir. 2016)