From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Anderson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 27, 2014
Civil 3:14-cv-01932-JST (N.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2014)

Opinion

          MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney, THOMAS MOORE, Chief, Tax Division, MICHAEL G. PITMAN, Assistant United States Attorney, Tax Division, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for the United States of America.

          EDWARD O. C. ORD, Ord & Norman, San Francisco, CA, Attorney for Respondent Sigurd Anderson.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SHOW CAUSE HEARING AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES

          JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Petitioner the United States of America ("United States") and Respondent Sigurd Anderson ("Respondent"), by and through undersigned counsel, that good cause exists and the parties request that the Court continue the show cause hearing set in the Court's Order dated May 23, 2014 (Doc. # 9), and associated deadlines, and state as follows in support:

         Pursuant to the Court's May 23rd Order, the following schedule is currently in place:

         

United States to serve Respondent: 6/19/14 Respondent's Opposition, if any, due: 7/3/14 United States' Reply, if any, due: 7/17/14 Show Cause Hearing 7/24/14 at 2:00 p.m.

         The United States has served Respondent. Respondent anticipates filing an Objection, but counsel for Respondent has requested a four-week extension of all existing deadlines due to pre-existing obligations. The United States does not oppose this request. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court amend the schedule as follows (with the remaining provisions of the Court's May 23rd Order remaining unchanged):

         

Respondent's Opposition, if any, due: 7/31/14 United States' Reply, if any, due: 8/14/14 Show Cause Hearing 8/21/14 at 2:00 p.m.

         The parties have not previously sought any extension of time in this matter.

         WHEREFORE the United States and Respondent hereby respectfully request that the Court extend the deadlines in this case by four-weeks, and grant such other and further relief as is just and proper.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown therein, it is hereby ORDERED the deadlines set forth in the Court's Order dated May 23, 2014 (Doc. # 9), are continued as follows:

         

Respondent's Opposition, if any, due: 7/31/14 United States' Reply, if any, due: 8/14/14 Show Cause Hearing 8/21/14 at 2:00 p.m.

         The remaining provisions of the Court's May 23rd Order remain unchanged.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Anderson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 27, 2014
Civil 3:14-cv-01932-JST (N.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Petitioner, v. Sigurd Anderson, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jun 27, 2014

Citations

Civil 3:14-cv-01932-JST (N.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2014)