Opinion
22-7386
08-31-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLYDE WAYNE ANDERSON, a/k/a Buck, Defendant-Appellant.
Clyde Wayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Paige O'Hale, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: August 29 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00474-FL-1)
Clyde Wayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Katharine Paige O'Hale, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Clyde Wayne Anderson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of Anderson's motion. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.[*] United States v. Anderson, No. 5:18-cr-00474-FL-1 (E.D. N.C. Nov. 3, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
[*] We decline to address the issues Anderson raises for the first time on appeal regarding the validity of his career offender status and the health of his son's caretaker. United States v. Herrera-Pagoada, 14 F.4th 311, 318 (4th Cir. 2021).