Opinion
CAUSE NO.:3:14-MC-11-JEM
01-26-2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. RYAN ANDERSEN d/b/a RYNO MANAGEMENT, Respondent.
OPINION
This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Hearing or Dismissal [DE 15], filed by Respondent, pro se, January 22, 2015. Respondent requests the Court dismiss the compliance ordered by this Court with a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") administrative subpoena.
Respondent previously filed a Motion for Hearing or Dismissal on December 17, 2014. The Petitioner responded January 5, 2015, and the Respondent did not reply. The Court denied the motion January 22, 2015, the same day the instant Motion was filed. The instant Motion does not provide any new facts to deny enforcement of the EPA's subpoena, but merely restates Respondent's objection to the amount of requested information. Accordingly, the Court's analysis contained in its January 22, 2015, Order and Opinion, which Respondent may not have yet received at the time of the instant Motion, continues to apply.
For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby DENIES Motion for Hearing or Dismissal [DE 15]. The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of the Court's January 22, 2015, Order and Opinion [DE 14].
SO ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2015.
s/ John E. Martin
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
cc: All counsel of record;
Ryan Andersen, pro se