From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Anastacio-Morales

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Feb 21, 2017
No. 16-40889 (5th Cir. Feb. 21, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-40889

02-21-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MAXIMO ANASTACIO-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant


Conference Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:15-CR-1428-1 Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Maximo Anastacio-Morales raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), which defines a crime of violence when incorporated by reference into U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (2014), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d at 672. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Anastacio-Morales

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Feb 21, 2017
No. 16-40889 (5th Cir. Feb. 21, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Anastacio-Morales

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MAXIMO ANASTACIO-MORALES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 21, 2017

Citations

No. 16-40889 (5th Cir. Feb. 21, 2017)

Citing Cases

United States v. Anastacio-Morales

We granted Anastacio-Morales's motion for summary affirmance so that he might seek further review. United…