From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Amin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
CR S-2:10-0364 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

CR S-2:10-0364 MCE

10-25-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SAKANDER SULTAN AMIN Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff By: THOMAS JOHNSON Attorney for Defendant SAKANDER SULTAN AMIN


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The United States of America, through its counsels of record, Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, defendant Sakander Sultan Amin through his counsel of record, Thomas Johnson, Esq., hereby stipulate and agree that the status conference set for October 13, 2011, be continued to October 20, 2011

The parties need additional time for preparation. Therefore, the parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Court set the date of October 20, 2011 for status conference.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and Local Code T4, United States Code section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), to give the defendants time to further review the discovery and to adequately prepare IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: MICHAEL M. BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

By: THOMAS JOHNSON

Attorney for Defendant

SAKANDER SULTAN AMIN

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and by stipulation of all parties, it is hereby ordered that this matter be set for further status conference as set forth above.

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court finds excludable time as set forth above to and including October 20, 2011. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Amin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
CR S-2:10-0364 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Amin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SAKANDER SULTAN AMIN Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

CR S-2:10-0364 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)