From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Amin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 1, 2011
No. 2:10-CR-00364-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-CR-00364-MCE

09-01-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SOHAIL AMIN and SAKANDER AMIN, Defendants.

Cristina C. Arguedas (CSB 87787) Daniel C. Roth (CSB 270569) ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY LLP Attorneys for Sohail Amin


Cristina C. Arguedas (CSB 87787)

Daniel C. Roth (CSB 270569)

ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY LLP

Attorneys for Sohail Amin

STIPULATION AND ORDER

RESETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

Hon. Morrison C. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG ALL PARTIES that the Status Conference currently set for September 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to October 13, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., in the same courtroom, and that the time beginning September 1, 2011 and extending through October 13, 2011, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties submit that the interests of justice are served by the exclusion of time, which will give counsel for each defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(a) and (b)(iv) and Local T4. Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Thomas A. Johnson, Attorney for Defendant Sakander Amin, and Cristina C. Arguedas, Attorney for Defendant Sohail Amin, all agree to this continuance.

Both defendants have recently received approximately 1,000 pages of discovery from the government, with additional discovery still forthcoming. As such, the attorneys for each defendant need more time to prepare, which will include reviewing discovery, discussing that discovery with their respective clients, considering new evidence that may affect the disposition of their respective cases, conducting necessary legal research and investigation, and then discussing with their clients how to proceed. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. See 18 USC 3161(h)(7)(a) and (b)(iv) and Local T4 (reasonable time for preparation of counsel).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

THOMAS A. JOHNSON

Attorney for Defendant

SAKANDER AMIN

CRISTINA C. ARGUEDAS

Attorney for Defendant

SOHAIL AMIN

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

For the reasons stated above, the status conference in this matter, currently September 1, 2011, is continued to October 12, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.; and the time beginning, September 1, 2011, and extending through October 12, 2011, is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act for effective defense preparation and plea negotiations. The Court finds that interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C.§ 3161 (h)(7)(a) and (b)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Amin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 1, 2011
No. 2:10-CR-00364-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Amin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SOHAIL AMIN and SAKANDER AMIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-CR-00364-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)