From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alvarez-Adame

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 19, 2012
466 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-50161 D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00059-LAB

01-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MIGUEL ALVAREZ-ADAME, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding


Submitted January 17, 2012

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Alvarez-Adame appeals from the 110-month sentence imposed following his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarez-Adame's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Alvarez-Adame filed a pro se supplemental brief and the government filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

We decline to reconsider Alvarez-Adame's challenge to the validity of the underlying deportation order because this court already decided that issue in United States v. Alvarez-Adame, 346 Fed. Appx. 169 (9th Cir. 2009). See United States v. Scrivner, 189 F.3d 825, 827 (9th Cir. 1999) (under the law of the case doctrine, one panel of an appellate court will not reconsider questions which another panel has decided on a prior appeal in the same case).

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to section 1326(b)).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED to correct the judgment.


Summaries of

United States v. Alvarez-Adame

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 19, 2012
466 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Alvarez-Adame

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MIGUEL ALVAREZ-ADAME…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

466 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2012)