From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alvarez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 20, 2012
No. 11-10671 (9th Cir. Sep. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-10671 D.C. No. 2:11-cr-01911-PGR

09-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ABRAHAM ALVAREZ, a.k.a. Abraham Alvarez-Renteria, a.k.a. Moises Alvarez-Renteria, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Charles B. Kornmann, District Judge, Presiding

The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Abraham Alvarez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Alvarez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 20, 2012
No. 11-10671 (9th Cir. Sep. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Alvarez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ABRAHAM ALVAREZ, a.k.a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

No. 11-10671 (9th Cir. Sep. 20, 2012)