From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alvarado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. CR-S-11-134 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-S-11-134 JAM

10-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN LOPEZ ALVARADO, et al., Defendants.

MICHAEL L. CHASTAINE Attorney for Defendant Edward Michael Tulysewski JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III Attorney for Defendant Michael Caspillo JOHN R. MANNING Attorney for Defendant Fred Pineda MATTHEW MCCRARY SCOBLE Attorney for Defendant Jose Mario Medrano Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874) ATTORNEY AT LAW Attorney for Defendant FRED PINEDA


JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorney for Defendant

FRED PINEDA

STIPULATION AND

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE

Judge: Honorable John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Edward Michael Tulysewski, Michael L. Chastaine, Esq., counsel for defendant Michael Caspillo, Johnny L. Griffin, III, counsel for defendant Fred Pineda, John R. Manning, Esq., and counsel for defendant Jose Mario Medrano, Matthew McCrary Scoble, Esq., that the status conference presently set for November 1, 2011 be continued to December 13, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., thus vacating the presently set status conference. Defendant Estanislao Garcia, represented by Danny D. Brace, Jr., Esq., wishes to remain on calendar.

Further, all of the parties, the United States of America and all of the defendants as stated above, hereby agree and stipulate that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendants and the public in a speedy trial and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded under Title 18, United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local Codes T-2 (unusual or complex case) and T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare) from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 28, 2011, to and including December 13, 2011. This is based on the complexity of the case; including over 5,000 pages of discovery as well as three discs of recorded phone calls, and the fact there are five co-defendants (a total of 13 Indicted). Defendants are currently incarcerated at the Butte County Jail in Oroville, California; approximately 120 miles roundtrip from downtown Sacramento. Due to the voluminous discovery in this matter numerous trips are required to effectively review the discovery; investigation reports; and, discuss USSG calculations.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MICHAEL L. CHASTAINE

Attorney for Defendant

Edward Michael Tulysewski

JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III

Attorney for Defendant

Michael Caspillo

JOHN R. MANNING

Attorney for Defendant

Fred Pineda

MATTHEW MCCRARY SCOBLE

Attorney for Defendant

Jose Mario Medrano

Benjamin B. Wagner

United States Attorney

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorney for Defendant

FRED PINEDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

v.

JUAN LOPEZ ALVARADO, et al., Defendants.

No. CR-S-11-134 JAM

ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERNCE

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the November 1, 2011 status conference be continued to December 13, 2011 at 9:30 a.m., with the exception of defendant Estanislao Garcia who wishes to remain on calendar. I find that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendant's need for continuity of counsel and reasonable time for effective preparation exceeds the public interest in a trial within 70 days. THEREFORE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv) and Local Codes T2 (unusual and complex case) and T4 (preparation by defense counsel). IT IS SO ORDERED.

John A. Mendez

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Alvarado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. CR-S-11-134 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Alvarado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN LOPEZ ALVARADO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No. CR-S-11-134 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)