From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Almeida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Mar 20, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 2:11-CR-127-DBH (D. Me. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 2:11-CR-127-DBH

03-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY E. ALMEIDA, III, AND JOHN MARTIN, DEFENDANTS


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On January 9, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Recommended Decision on Motions to Suppress. The defendant Almeida filed his objection to the Recommended Decision on January 23, 2012. No objection has been filed by the defendant Martin. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, including the suppression hearing transcript and exhibits; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The motions to suppress are DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

_____________

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Almeida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Mar 20, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 2:11-CR-127-DBH (D. Me. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Almeida

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY E. ALMEIDA, III, AND JOHN MARTIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 2:11-CR-127-DBH (D. Me. Mar. 20, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Melchior

lity . . . ."); United States v. Gadson, 763 F.3d 1189, 1203 (9th Cir. 2014) (district court did not err in…