From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Allen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Sep 9, 2013
Case No. 1:10-cr-152 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cr-152

2013-09-09

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEDRICK ALLEN


JUDGE COLLIER


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SEDRICAK ALLEN ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for an initial appearance before the undersigned on September 5, 2013, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the September 5, 2013, hearing included:

(1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government.
(2) The Supervised Releasee.
(3) Attorney Myrlene Marsa for defendant.

After being sworn in due form of law, the Supervised Releasee was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the Supervised Releasee wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. was APPOINTED to represent the defendant. It was determined the Supervised Releasee had been provided with a copy of the Petition and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with his attorney. It was also determined he was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents he had been provided.

The Supervised Releasee waived his right to a preliminary hearing but requested a detention hearing.

The Government relied on the sworn affidavit of USPO Candace Lindsey and moved that the Supervised Releasee be detained pending the revocation hearing.

Findings


(1) Based upon USPO Lindsey's testimony and Supervised Releasee's waiver of preliminary hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe
Supervised Releasee has committed violations of his conditions of supervised release as alleged or set forth in the Petition.
(2) The Supervised Releasee has not carried his burden under Rule 32.1(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, that if released on bail he will not flee or will not pose a danger to the community.

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) The motion of the Government that the Supervised Releasee be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending the revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier is GRANTED.
(2) The U.S. Marshal shall transport the Supervised Releasee to a revocation hearing Judge Collier on Thursday, October 10, 2013, at 2:00 pm.

ENTER.

____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Allen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Sep 9, 2013
Case No. 1:10-cr-152 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 9, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEDRICK ALLEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Sep 9, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cr-152 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 9, 2013)