From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alexander

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 25, 2013
No. 12-7756 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7756

02-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL SHAWN ALEXANDER, Defendant - Appellant.

Michael Shawn Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00039-FDW-DCK-4) Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Shawn Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Shawn Alexander appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:04-cr-00039-FDW-DCK-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Alexander

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 25, 2013
No. 12-7756 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL SHAWN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

No. 12-7756 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2013)