From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alexander

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 25, 2022
2:99-cr-00363-APG (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2022)

Opinion

2:99-cr-00363-APG

10-25-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. FRANK ALEXANDER, Defendant


ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE [ECF Nos. 35, 36]

ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant Frank Alexander passed away on August 28, 2019. ECF No. 33. Three years later, someone filed an unsigned motion for early termination of supervised release on Mr. Alexander's behalf. ECF No. 35. Mr. Alexander was not on supervised release because he is dead; and if he were alive he would still be in custody. The Government moves to strike the motion for early termination as a rogue document. ECF No. 36. I agree.

I THEREFORE ORDER that the Government's motion to strike (ECF No. 36) is granted. The motion for early termination (ECF No. 35) is stricken from the record.


Summaries of

United States v. Alexander

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 25, 2022
2:99-cr-00363-APG (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. FRANK ALEXANDER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 25, 2022

Citations

2:99-cr-00363-APG (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2022)