From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 17, 2011
No. CR-11-00623 SBA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-11-00623 SBA

10-17-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBIE RAY ALEXANDER, Defendant.

WADE RHYNE Assistant United States Attorney ANGELA M. HANSEN Assistant Federal Public Defender


BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

ANGELA M. HANSEN

Assistant Federal Public Defender

555 - 12th Street, Suite 650

Oakland, CA 94607-3627

Telephone: (510) 637-3500

Counsel for Defendant ALEXANDER

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE

HEARING DATE TO NOVEMBER 14,

2011 AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER

THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND ORDER

The above-captioned matter is set on October 17, 2011 before this Court for a status hearing. The parties jointly request that the Court continue the matter to November 14, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., and that the Court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), between October 17, 2011 and November 14, 2011.

On September 1, 2011, the Grand Jury charged Bobbie Ray Alexander as a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He faces a statutory maximum of ten years in custody. Mr. Alexander made his initial appearance on September 15, 2011, and the magistrate court detained Mr. Alexander on September 27, 2011.

The current status of the case is that the parties are negotiating this matter and anticipate that there will be a negotiated disposition of the case. In the meantime, the government has produced discovery to the defense and defense counsel needs additional time to review and process the discovery provided and to discuss those materials with her client. The defense also requires additional time to complete its investigation of the circumstances of the offense and to collect Mr. Alexander's prior conviction records to prepare an estimate of his anticipated Guidelines range.

The requested continuance will allow the defense to complete its review of the discovery, to investigate the underlying facts of the case, and to obtain and review records. For this reason, the parties agree that the failure to grant this continuance would unreasonably deny counsel for defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The parties further stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the parties agree that the period of time from October 17, 2011 to November 14, 2011, should be excluded in accordance with the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation of defense counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

WADE RHYNE

Assistant United States Attorney

ANGELA M. HANSEN

Assistant Federal Public Defender

ORDER

Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby FINDS:

1. Given that the government has produced discovery in this case and that defense counsel needs time to complete its review the discovery and to discuss the discovery materials with her client;

2. Given that the defense needs additional time to continue to investigate the underlying facts of the case and to obtain records to calculate defendant's sentencing Guidelines range;

3. Given that these above-listed tasks are necessary to the defense preparation of the case and that the failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny counsel for defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence;

4. Given that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial;

Based on these findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the STATUS date of October 17, 2011 scheduled at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong, is vacated and reset for November 14, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. It is FURTHER ORDERED that time is excluded pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), from October 17, 2011 to November 14, 2011.

HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 17, 2011
No. CR-11-00623 SBA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBIE RAY ALEXANDER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

No. CR-11-00623 SBA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)