Opinion
21-20069-CR-ALTONAGA/Torres
10-12-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRIANA PEREZ DE ALEJO, Defendant.
ORDER
CECILIA M. ALTONAGA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant's Written Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation Denying Motion to Suppress Post-Arrest Statements [ECF No. 161], filed on October 8, 2021. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 154], the transcript of the suppression hearing (see [ECF No. 161-2]), and the entire record; and having made a de novo determination with respect to those portions of the Report to which Defendant has formally objected, it is
“The Court need not do over every step done by a magistrate judge on which there was some objection. De novo review means review without any deference; it does not mean that a district judge must redo the case without consideration of what the magistrate judge has written.” DeJonge v. Burton, No. 1:16-cv-980, 2018 WL 4929756, at *1 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 11, 2018) (quotation marks and citation omitted).
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation on Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements [ECF No. 154] is ADOPTED in its entirety, and the Objections [ECF No. 161] are OVERRULED. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Post-Arrest Statement[s] [ECF No. 119] is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 12th day of October, 2021.