From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alcala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
No. Cr.S-10-395 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. Cr.S-10-395 LKK

09-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff v. GERARDO ALCALA, et. al., Defendant

BENJAMINE B. WAGNER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Todd Leras Assistant United States Attorney Michael B. Bigelow Attorney for Gerardo Alcala Caro Marks Attorney for Alfred del Toro Phil Cozens Attorney for Luis Sanchez Scott Tedmon Attorney for Sean Blackwell Michael Chastaine Attorney for Jerome Wells Michael Hansen Attorney for David Avila-Sandoval Christopher Cosca Attorney for Gabriel Garcia Danny Brace Attorney for Gregorio Tellez Clemente Jimenez Attorney for Israel Deltoro-Chavez Kyle Knapp Attorney for Thomas Sotelo Erin Radekin Attorney for Searcy Andrews


MICHAEL B. BIGELOW

Attorney at Law - SBN 65211

Attorney for Defendant

Gerardo Alcala

STIPULATION CONTINUING STATUS CONFERANCE


ORDER

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, together with counsel for all defendants in the above referenced matter that the status conference presently set for September 20, 2011 be continued to December 20, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., thus vacating the presently set status conference.

Counsel for the parties agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) (continuity of counsel/reasonable time for effective preparation) and Local Code T4, and agree to exclude time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of new the status conference, December 20, 2011.

This continuance is requested because this is a wire-tap case, the large number of defendants and the amount of discovery. There are audio files numbering approximately 2,000 and related transcripts, all of which supports the complex nature of the case and the need for time for all counsel to effectively prepare. It is agreed as well that the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interest in the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMINE B. WAGNER

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Todd Leras

Assistant United States Attorney

Michael B. Bigelow

Attorney for Gerardo Alcala

Caro Marks

Attorney for Alfred del Toro

Phil Cozens

Attorney for Luis Sanchez

Scott Tedmon

Attorney for Sean Blackwell

Michael Chastaine

Attorney for Jerome Wells

Michael Hansen

Attorney for David Avila-Sandoval

Christopher Cosca

Attorney for Gabriel Garcia

Danny Brace

Attorney for Gregorio Tellez

Clemente Jimenez

Attorney for Israel Deltoro-Chavez

Kyle Knapp

Attorney for Thomas Sotelo

Erin Radekin

Attorney for Searcy Andrews

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT: Pursuant to stipulation by all parties the Status Conference in the above referenced matter, presently set for September 20, 2011 is rescheduled for December 20, 2011 at 9:15 AM. It is also agreed by the parties that time should be excluded for continuity of counsel and reasonable time for effective preparation and complexity within the meaning of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), and Local Codes T2 and T4,from the date of the filing of the order until the date of new the status conference, December 20, 2011.

The Court specifically finds that the number of defendants and the amount of discovery in this wire-tap case, with audio files numbering approximately 2,000 and related transcripts, supports the complex nature of the case and the need for time for all counsel to effectively prepare. The Court also finds that the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interest in the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Alcala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
No. Cr.S-10-395 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Alcala

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff v. GERARDO ALCALA, et. al., Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

No. Cr.S-10-395 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)