From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alaniz-Deras

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 2005
137 F. App'x 5 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted June 14, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Page 6.

Michael T. Morrissey, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gregory Parzych, Esq., Attorney at Law, Mesa, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00491-1-DGC.

Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Francisco Alaniz-Deras appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 22-month sentence for harboring of illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Alaniz-Deras has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.


Summaries of

United States v. Alaniz-Deras

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 2005
137 F. App'x 5 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Alaniz-Deras

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Francisco ALANIZ-DERAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 17, 2005

Citations

137 F. App'x 5 (9th Cir. 2005)