United States v. Ahmmed

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ferdous AHMMED…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

144 F. App'x 661 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted September 12, 2005. ^*

* This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Tammy C. Spertus, Esq., USLA--Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kenneth M. Stern, Esq., Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-01184-MLR.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Ferdous Ahmmed appeals his 46-month sentence imposed after a jury trial conviction for 3 counts of witness retaliation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.