From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ahammad

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 15, 2022
S3 21 Cr. 456 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)

Opinion

S3 21 Cr. 456 (ALC)

07-15-2022

UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA v. FIROZ AHAMMAD, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BY THOMAS JOHN WRIGHT ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FIROZAHAMMAD BY ZACHARY STEWART TAYLOR, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT


DAMIAN WILLIAMS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BY THOMAS JOHN WRIGHT ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

FIROZAHAMMAD BY ZACHARY STEWART TAYLOR, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTY/ MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about July 14, 2021, FIROZ AHAMMAD (the “Defendant”),' was charged in a two-count Superseding Information, S3 21 Cr. 456 (ALC) (the“Information”), with conspiracy to smuggle catfish, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, action 371 (Count One); and smuggling catfish into the United States, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 545 and 2 (Count Two);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and Two of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(B), of any and all property constituting or derived from proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained; and, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 545, any merchandise introduced into the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 545, or the value thereof;

WHEREAS, in or about 2019 and 2021, the Government seized the following property:

a) all property contained inside container OOLU6230482, seized on or about January 25, 2019;
b) all property contained inside container OOLU6282300, seized on or about August 5, 2019;
c) all property contained inside container OOLU6204077, seized on or about August 13, 2019;
d) all property contained inside container OOLU6263763, seized on or about January 25, 2019;
e) all contraband seized during the execution of search warrants on or about October 17, 2019 at 56-29 56th Drive, Maspeth, NY 11378 and 56-09 56th Drive, Maspeth, NY 11378; and
f) a check i n the amount of $300,000.00 made payable from the checking account of Asia Foods Distributor Inc. (Chase Account Number xxxxx6822) to “CBP FPF,” seized on or about March 2, 2021 and deposited (the "Check").
(a through f, collectively the “Specific Property”);

WHEREAS, on or about October 7, 2021, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, a sum of money equal, to $354,000 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of said offense that the Defendant personally obtained and all right, title and interest of the Defendant in the Specific Property;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $354,000 in United States currency, representing proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with his co-defendants Mahmud Chowdhury, Shakil Ahmed, and Belayet Hussain (the “Co-defendants”) to the extent forfeiture money judgments are entered against the Co-defendants in this case;

WHEREAS, the Defendant further consents to the forfeiture of all his right, title and interest in the Specific Property, which constitutes merchandise introduced into the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 545 as a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information;

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(g), and Rules 32.2(b)(3), and 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Government is now entitled, pending any assertion of third-party claims, to reduce the Specific Property to its possession and to notify any and all persons who reasonably appear to be a potential claimant of their interest herein.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Thomas John Wright, of counsel, and the Defendant and his counsel, Zachary Stewart Taylor, Esq., that:

1. As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the information to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $354,000 in United States currency (the “ Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with the Co-defendants, to the extent forfeiture money judgments are entered against the Co-defendants in this case, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, all of the Defendant's right, title and interest in the Specific Property is hereby forfeited to the United States for disposition in accordance with the law, subject to the provisions of Title 21, United States Code, Section 853.

3. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, FIROZ AHAMMAD, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be in duded in the judgment of conviction therewith.

4. All payments on the outstanding Money Judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to United States Customs and Border Protection, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

5. Upon entry of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, and pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, United States Customs and Border Protection, or its designed the Office of Fines, Penalties, and Forfeiture shall be authorized to deposit the payment on the Money Judgment into the Treasury Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

6. Upon entry of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, the United States Customs and Border Protection (or its designee) is hereby authorized to take possess! on of the Specific Property and to hold such property in its secure custody and control.

7. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n)(1), Rule32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Rules G(4)(a)(iv)(C) and G(5)(a)(ii) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Cl aims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, the United States is permitted to publish forfeiture notices on the government internet site, www.forfeiture.gov. This site incorporates the forfeiture notices that have been traditionally published in newspapers. The United States forth with shall publish the internet ad for at east thirty (30) consecutive days. Any person, other than the Defendant, claiming interest in the Specific Property must file a Petition within sixty (60) days from the first day of publication of the Notice on this official government internet web site, or no later than thirty-five (35) days from the mailing of actual notice, whichever is earlier.

8. The published notice of forfeiture shall state that the petition (i) shall before a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner's alleged interest in the Specific Property, (ii) shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury, and (iii) shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title or interest in the Specific Property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the right, title and interest in the Specific Property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim, and the relief sought, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n).

9. Pursuant to 32.2 (b)(6)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Government shall send notice to any person who reasonably appears to be a potential claimant with standing to contest the forfeiture in the ancillary proceeding.

10. Upon adjudication of all third-party interests, this Court will enter a Final Order of Forfeiture with respect to the Specific Property pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n), in which all interests will be addressed. The Check forfeited to the United States under a Final Order of Forfeiture shall be applied towards the satisfaction of the Money Judgment.

11. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

12. Pursuant to Rule32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

13. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

14. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ahammad

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 15, 2022
S3 21 Cr. 456 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Ahammad

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA v. FIROZ AHAMMAD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 15, 2022

Citations

S3 21 Cr. 456 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)