From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Agustin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CR-0298-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CR-0298-DAD

09-12-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOCELYN M. AGUSTIN and EMMA Y. MIRADOR, Defendants.

TIM A. PORI Attorney for Defendant MIRADOR LINDA HARTER Attorney for Defendant AGUSTIN DAVID STEVENS Assistant U.S. Attorney


Tim A. Pori (SBN 189270)

John F. Baumgardner (SBN 275674)

LAW OFFICES OF TIM A. PORI

Attorney for Defendant EMMA Y. MIRADOR

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME

The parties hereby stipulate that the case management conference in this case be continued from September 13, 2011 to September 20, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. The parties stipulate that the time between September 13, 2011 to September 20, 2011, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4. Specifically, defense counsel cannot properly advise his client of the implications of the plea and charges recommended by the Government without additional time to investigate.

Therefore the parties have stipulated to continue the case management conference in this case. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A).

Respectfully submitted

TIM A. PORI

Attorney for Defendant MIRADOR

LINDA HARTER

Attorney for Defendant AGUSTIN

DAVID STEVENS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Status Conference in the above-entitled matter is continued to September 20, at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd.

_________

MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Agustin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CR-0298-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Agustin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOCELYN M. AGUSTIN and EMMA Y…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CR-0298-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)