From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Aguirre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2011
Case No.: 2:10-CR-00445-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:10-CR-00445-MCE

09-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY PAUL AGUIRRE, Defendant

THOMAS A. JOHNSON Attorney for Defendant GREGORY PAUL AGUIRRE BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney MICHELLE PRINCE Assistant U.S. Attorney


THOMAS A. JOHNSON, #119203

Attorney for Defendant Gregory Paul Aguirre

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING

Date: October 27th, 2011

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG ALL PARTIES that the Status Conference scheduled for September 6th, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. is continued to October 27th, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in the same courtroom. Michelle Prince, Assistant United States Attorney and Thomas A. Johnson, Defendant's attorney, are requesting such continuance in order to continue review of discovery and preparation of counsel. Mr. Johnson and the Assistant United States Attorney are currently trying to resolve the case.

It is further stipulated that the period from the date of this stipulation through and including October 27th, 2011, be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) and Local T4 (reasonable time for preparation of counsel).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

THOMAS A. JOHNSON

Attorney for Defendant

GREGORY PAUL AGUIRRE

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHELLE PRINCE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

For the reasons stated above, the status conference in this matter, currently September 6, 2011, is continued to October 27, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.; and the time beginning September 1, 2011, and extending through October 27, 2011, is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act for effective defense preparation and plea negotiations. The Court finds that interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C.§ 3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). In all future stipulations such as this one, counsel is advised to cite to the correct section of the United States Code governing exclusions of time from the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Aguirre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2011
Case No.: 2:10-CR-00445-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Aguirre

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY PAUL AGUIRRE, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 2:10-CR-00445-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)