From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Aguilar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 24, 2011
No. CR-10-00825 DLJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-10-00825 DLJ

10-24-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESSICA AGUILAR, Defendant.

VARELL L. FULLER Assistant Federal Public Defender THOMAS COLTHURST Assistant United States Attorney


BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

VARELL L. FULLER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Counsel for Defendant AGUILAR

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING DATE AS TO

DEFENDANT JESSICA AGUILAR

STIPULATION

Defendant Jessica Aguilar, by and through Assistant Federal Public Defender Varell L. Fuller, and the United States, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Thomas Colthurst, hereby stipulate that, with the Court's approval, the hearing date currently set for November 1, 2011, be continued to Tuesday, January 17, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for the requested continuance is that negotiations are ongoing and the parties do not anticipate that they will be prepared to resolve the case on November 1, 2011. In addition, Mr. Colthurst is about to begin a trial in San Francisco and will be largely unavailable until after the first of the year. The parties have discussed the proposed date of January 17, 2012, with the Court's clerk and have been advised that this date is available.

The parties agree that the time between November 1, 2011, and January 17, 2012, is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for continuity of counsel and effective preparation by defense counsel.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

VARELL L. FULLER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

THOMAS COLTHURST

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, upon stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing date currently set for Tuesday, November 1, 2011, shall be continued to Tuesday, January 17, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

THE COURT FINDS that failing to exclude the time between November 1, 2011, and January 17, 2012, would unreasonably deny the government continuity of counsel, and would unreasonably deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between November 1, 2011, and January 17, 2012, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between November 1, 2011, and January 17, 2012, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE D. LOWELL JENSEN

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Aguilar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 24, 2011
No. CR-10-00825 DLJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Aguilar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESSICA AGUILAR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

No. CR-10-00825 DLJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)