From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Agrava

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
NO. 1:11-cr-00301 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 1:11-cr-00301 LJO

01-12-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN MARSHALL AGRAVA, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney BRIAN ENOS Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Kevin Marshall Agrava


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

Kevin Marshall Agrava

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND ORDER (note time

change)


Date: February 6, 2012

Time: 1:00 p.m.

Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, BRIAN ENOS, Assistant United States Attorney, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant, Kevin Marshall Agrava, that the date for status conference may be continued to February 6, 2012, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is January 17, 2012. The requested new date is February 6, 2012, at 1:00 p.m.

The government has recently provided a plea offer to the defense and the parties are engaged in negotiations concerning the terms of the offer. Additional investigation, research and negotiations are necessary to determine the applicability of potential offense characteristics under the sentencing guidelines. It is anticipated that the parties will either enter a plea agreement or request a trial date at the next status conference.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the requested continuance shall be excluded as necessary for continuity of counsel, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By _________________________

BRIAN ENOS

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

By _________________________

ERIC V. KERSTEN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Kevin Marshall Agrava

ORDER

Good cause exists for the continuance. It will be at 2 p.m. on the date requested. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Agrava

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
NO. 1:11-cr-00301 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Agrava

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN MARSHALL AGRAVA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

NO. 1:11-cr-00301 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)