Opinion
23-cv-20013
03-12-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW D. ADAMS, Defendant.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Now before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Amend Judgment. Defendant asks the Court to amend the judgment to add a recommendation that Defendant be permitted to participate in the RDAP program offered by the Bureau of Prisons. The motion is DENIED. The Court is not persuaded that it should make the requested recommendation. While the presentence investigation report described past drug and alcohol abuse by Defendant, the PSR further indicated that the Texas Christian University Drug Screen V was administered to Defendant, and that screen indicated that Defendant had “no signs of a substance abuse disorder.”
IT IS SO ORDERED.