From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Acosta-Cantabrana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
NO. 2:11-cr-00445-MCE-1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 2:11-cr-00445-MCE-1

01-23-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERNESTO ACOSTA-CANTABRANA, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Public Defender COURTNEY FEIN Assistant Federal Defender


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

COURTNEY FEIN, Bar #244785

Designated Counsel for Service

Former Attorney for Defendant

ERNESTO ACOSTA-CANTABRANA

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S ELIGIBILITY FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL


Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

The Office of the Federal Defender, after checking its records, can represent to the court that Mr. Acosta-Cantabrana was indigent at the time the court appointed the Federal Defender to represent him. Additionally, the Office of the Federal Defender has since become aware that funds other than his own were used to hire the privately retained attorney who now represents Mr. Acosta-Cantabrana. In view of these facts, the Federal Defender believes that Mr. Acosta-Cantabara continues to remain indigent and eligible for appointed counsel. The Federal Defender requests that the court make the order proposed below.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Public Defender

____________

COURTNEY FEIN

Assistant Federal Defender

ORDER

Based on the representation of his previously court-appointed counsel, the court finds that Mr. Acosta-Cantabrana's net financial resources and income are insufficient to enable him to obtain private counsel. Pursuant to Section § 2.04 of the Guide to Judiciary Policies and Procedures, the court will not consider family resources that have allowed the defendant to retain private counsel. The court will order the defendant to pay the cost of his representation only if additional financial resources become available rendering him ineligible for status as an indigent defendant. Counsel is ordered to inform the court of any such change in status.

________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Acosta-Cantabrana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
NO. 2:11-cr-00445-MCE-1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Acosta-Cantabrana

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERNESTO ACOSTA-CANTABRANA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

NO. 2:11-cr-00445-MCE-1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)