From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ackerman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 8, 2022
20 Cr. 93 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

20 Cr. 93 (LTS)

03-08-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL ACKERMAN, Defendant.


CORRECTED PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTY/ MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN DATE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about February 3, 2020, MICHAEL ACKERMAN (the “Defendant”), was charged in a two-count Indictment, 20 Cr. 93 (LTS) (the “Indictment”), with wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Count One); and money laundering, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) (Count Two);

WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461, of any and all property, real and personal that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency, representing the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, and various specific assets;

WHEREAS, on or about July 29, 2021, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, on or about September 8, 2021, the Court entered a Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment imposing a forfeiture money judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $36,268,515.00 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”) representing proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained (the “Preliminary Order of Forfeiture”);

WHEREAS, the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture incorrectly identified the United States Marshals Service as the agency authorized to accept payments made towards the satisfaction of the Money Judgment and to deposit them into the Asset Forfeiture Fund; and

WHEREAS, the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture is to be corrected only as to the corrected agency, and the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture should in all other respects remain unchanged and fully incorporated herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. All payments on the outstanding Money Judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable to the United States Customs and Border Protection and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

2. The United States Customs and Border Protection, or its designee, is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Treasury Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Corrected Preliminary

Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Ackerman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 8, 2022
20 Cr. 93 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Ackerman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL ACKERMAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

20 Cr. 93 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2022)