From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. 3040 South Taft Hill Rd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01210-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01210-CMA-MEH

11-18-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 3040 SOUTH TAFT HILL ROAD, and 1951 KINNISON DRIVE, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, Defendants, CHRISTIAN RISON, Claimant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on November 18, 2011.

Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [filed November 16, 2011; docket #21] is denied without prejudice for failure to submit a proposed amended complaint by which the Court might determine whether "justice so requires" leave to amend pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). In addition, the Court reminds the parties of their continuing obligations to comply fully with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).


Summaries of

United States v. 3040 South Taft Hill Rd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01210-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 18, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. 3040 South Taft Hill Rd.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 3040 SOUTH TAFT HILL ROAD, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 18, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01210-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 18, 2011)