From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. $209,815 in United States Currency

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 16, 2014
3:14-cv-00780-SC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2014)

Opinion

DAVID M. MICHAEL, EDWARD M. BURCH, LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. MICHAEL, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Claimant JULIO FIGUEROA.

MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney, PATRICIA J. KENNEY, Assistant United States Attorney, Attorneys for the United States.


STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR MOTION TO SUPPRESS REPLY BRIEF NUNC PRO TUNC

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

The parties through their undersigned counsel agree, subject to the Court's approval, that Claimant may have up to and including June 13, 2014, to file his reply in support of his motion to suppress.

The reply brief was due on or before June 10, 2014. The reason the Claimant has requested counsel for Plaintiff to agree an extension for the filing deadline by three days is due to unexpected increased case load, mainly regarding Claimant's counsel's ongoing murder prosecution in Orange County, California, while co-counsel Burch was overseas on a long planned vacation. Counsel for Plaintiff graciously agreed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. $209,815 in United States Currency

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 16, 2014
3:14-cv-00780-SC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. $209,815 in United States Currency

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. $209,815 IN UNITED STATES…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Jun 16, 2014

Citations

3:14-cv-00780-SC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2014)