From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 27, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01173-CMA (D. Colo. Aug. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-cv-01173-CMA Criminal Action No. 12-cr-00038-CMA-14

08-27-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 14. RAMONA ROMAN, Defendant.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order Dismissing 28 U.S.C. §2255 Motion of Judge Christine M. Arguello entered on August 27, 2015, it is

ORDERED that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion (Docket No. 944, filed June 4, 2015) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the corresponding civil action is dismissed.

DATED: August 27, 2015

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

s/ V. Barnes

V. Barnes, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

United States v. Roman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 27, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01173-CMA (D. Colo. Aug. 27, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Roman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 14. RAMONA ROMAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 27, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-cv-01173-CMA (D. Colo. Aug. 27, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Shehata

Mr. Bartee's advice was reasonable, balanced, and clearly satisfies the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel.…

United States v. DeBerry

(“The defendants' reliance on . . . Alleyne is misplaced as none of the defendants were subject to mandatory…