From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Spitzer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DISTRICT
Nov 22, 2011
Civil Action No. 10 C 3758 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10 C 3758

11-22-2011

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL SPITZER, et al. Defendants.

Natalie G. Garner Attorney for Plaintiff U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Judge Leinenweber


Magistrate Judge Denlow


PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF ITS CLAIMS FOR

DISGORGEMENT, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AND CIVIL PENALTIES

AGAINST ENTITY DEFENDANTS AND

FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST ENTITY DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") moves for the dismissal of all claims of monetary relief asserted by the Commission against Kenzie Financial Management, Inc. ("Kenzie Financial"); Draseena Funds Group, Corp. ("Draseena"); Kenzie Services LLC ("Kenzie Services"); Aneesard Management LLC

("Aneesard"); Nerium Management Co. ("Nerium"); DN Management Co. LLC ("DN"); Arrow Fund, LLC; Arrow Fund II, LLC; Nerium Currency Fund, LP; Conservium Fund, LLC; Senior Strength Q Fund, LLC; Three Oaks Senior Strength Fund, LLC; Three Oaks Fund, LP; Three Oaks Currency Fund, LP; Three Oaks Advanced Fund, LLC; Three Oaks Fund 25, LLC; USFirst Fund, LLC; and SSecurity Fund, LLC (referred to collectively as the "Entity Defendants"). The Commission also moves for an entry of final judgment against the Entity Defendants. In support of its Motion the Commission states as follows:

1. On June 17, 2010, the Commission filed its Complaint against Daniel Spitzer ("Spitzer") and the Entity Defendants. (Docket No. 2).

2. On December 6, 2010, the Court entered an order of permanent injunction against the Entity Defendants and a final judgment against Spitzer. (See Docket No. 73). The Order also required Spitzer to pay disgorgement in the amount of $33,988,102, plus prejudgment interest of $10,093,866, and a civil penalty of $150,000. (See id. at 6). In addition, the Order froze all funds and other assets of Spitzer and the Entity Defendants until completion of the collections process or as otherwise ordered by the Court. (See id. at 7).

3. On February 10, 2011, a criminal indictment was filed against Spitzer in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging eight counts of mail fraud. A superseding indictment was filed on September 28, 2011, which added additional counts and an additional defendant. The criminal indictment arises out of the same conduct underlying this litigation. The indictment includes a claim for forfeiture of Spitzer's assets. Spitzer has pled not guilty and is currently awaiting trial.

4. The Entity Defendants, which were all owned and/or controlled by Spitzer, are now defunct and no longer operational, and many have ceased to exist as corporate or partnership entities.

5. Further, any disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil penalties obtained against the Entity Defendants would be duplicative of the monetary judgment obtained against Spitzer and the forfeiture being sought in the criminal case.

6. If the Court allows for the dismissal of the monetary claims against the Entity Defendants, then all claims in this matter will be resolved. Thus, final judgments of permanent injunction, consistent with the December 6, 2010 orders of permanent injunction, should be entered against the Entity Defendants.

WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that the Court enter an order (1) dismissing the Commission's claim for disgorgement and prejudgment interest against the Entity Defendants; (2) dismissing the Commission's claim for civil penalties pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)] against Draseena, Kenzie Financial, Nerium Management, Aneesard and DN Management, each party to bear its own cost; (3) dismissing the Commission's claim for civil penalties pursuant to Section 209(e) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 [15 U.S.C. § 80b-9(e)] against Kenzie Financial, each party to bear its own costs; and (4) that the Court enter final judgments of permanent injunction against each of the Entity Defendants.

Respectfully Submitted,

U.S. SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION

By: Natalie G. Garner

One of its Attorneys

James G. Lundy

Natalie G. Garner

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Chicago Regional Office

175 West Jackson Blvd.

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312)353-7390

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Natalie G. Garner, an Attorney for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby certify that on November 22, 2011, I caused true and correct copies of the foregoing to be served upon the following via overnight mail:

Daniel Spitzer

32 Ketterling Court

North Barrington, IL 60010

Kenzie Financial Management, Inc.

Kenzie Services, LLC

c/o Daniel Spitzer

32 Ketterling Ct., North Barrington, IL 60010

Draseena Funds Group, Corp.

Nerium Management Co.

c/o Ben M. Roth, Esq.

Kamensky Rubinstein Hochman & Delott, LLP

7250 N. Cicero Avenue, Suite 200

Lincolnwood, IL 60712

Aneesard Management LLC

DN Management Co. LLC

Arrow Fund, LLC

Arrow Fund II LLC

Conservium Fund, LLC

Nerium Currency Fund, LLC

Senior Strength Q Fund, LLC

SSecurity Fund, LLC

Three Oaks Advanced Fund, LLC

Three Oaks Currency Fund, LP

Three Oaks Fund, LP

Three Oaks Fund 25, LLC

Three Oaks Senior Strength Fund, LLC

US First Fund, LLC

c/o Alling & Jillson, Ltd.

276 Kingsbury Grade

Suite 2000

Stateline, NV 89449

Natalie G. Garner

Attorney for Plaintiff

U.S. SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Summaries of

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Spitzer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DISTRICT
Nov 22, 2011
Civil Action No. 10 C 3758 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Spitzer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10 C 3758 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2011)