From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Shumake

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 24, 2024
21-cv-12193 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 24, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-12193

06-24-2024

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT SAMUEL SHUMAKE, JR., et al., Defendants.


ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 45); (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 46); DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AUTOMATIC STAY AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 57); AND (4) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ABATE OR STAY PROCEEDINGS (ECF NO. 60)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 21, 2024, the Court held a motion hearing to address the motions identified in the title of this Order above. As a result of that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is GRANTED for the reasons stated on the record during the hearing. By not later than July 25, 2024, Defendant shall fully respond to all of the interrogatories, requests to produce, and subpoenas that are identified in the Motion to Compel and attached as exhibits to the Motion. By “fully respond,” the Court means that Defendant shall provide complete answers to all interrogatories and shall produce all requested documents and all documents sought by subpoena.

2. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is GRANTED for the reasons explained on the record. Plaintiff may amend its Complaint for the sole purpose of changing Defendant's name to his new legal name. Defendant need not file a new Answer to the Amended Complaint. As discussed on the record, Defendant's prior Answer shall remain operative. However, not more than 21 days after Plaintiff files the Amended Complaint, Defendant shall file a notice on the docket stating whether he denies that his legal name is as alleged in the Amended Complaint.

3. Defendant's Motion to Enforce Automatic Stay is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record and for the reasons stated in Plaintiff's filings addressing the automatic stay issue (ECF Nos. 50, 58, and 63).

4. Defendant's Motion to Stay or Abate Proceedings is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record and for the reasons stated in Plaintiff's filings addressing the automatic stay issue (ECF Nos. 50, 58, and 63).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on June 24, 2024, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.

Holly A. Ryan

Case Manager

(313) 234-5126


Summaries of

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Shumake

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 24, 2024
21-cv-12193 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 24, 2024)
Case details for

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Shumake

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 24, 2024

Citations

21-cv-12193 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 24, 2024)