From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Qin

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 1, 2022
20-CV-10849 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-10849 (LGS)

03-01-2022

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. STEFAN QIN, VIRGIL TECHNOLOGIES LLC, MONTGOMERY TECHNOLOGIES LLC, VIRGIL QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH, LLC, VIRGIL CAPITAL LLC, and VQR PARTNERS LLC, Defendants.


[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT STEFAN QIN

Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) having filed a complaint; and Defendant Stefan Qin having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment as to him; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:

I.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

II.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

III.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Section 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5), Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly participating in the issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security through any entity owned or controlled by Defendant; provided, however, that this injunction shall not prevent Defendant from purchasing or selling securities listed on a national securities exchange for his own personal account.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant's officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a).

IV.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $36,352,028 with pre-judgment interest thereon in the amount of $3,494,791, for a total of $39,846,819, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint. This amount shall be deemed satisfied by: (1) Defendant's relinquishment of all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in all properties, businesses, funds and assets currently controlled by the Court Appointed Receiver in this action (“Receiver”), and all claims he might assert against the receivership estate; and, (2) the judgment, including the order of forfeiture of $54,793,532.14, entered against him in the criminal case, United States v. Stefan Qin, Case No. 21-CR-075 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y.), on September 15, 2021.

V.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.

VI.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under any judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19).

VII.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.

VIII.

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Qin

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 1, 2022
20-CV-10849 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)
Case details for

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Qin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. STEFAN QIN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 1, 2022

Citations

20-CV-10849 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)