From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. J.T. Battenberg

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 3, 2022
No. 06-14891 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

06-14891

11-03-2022

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. J.T. BATTENBERG, III and PAUL FREE, Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

DAVID M. LAWSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 27, 2022, attorney Susan K. DeClercq filed a “notice of U.S. Attorney withdrawal” of her appearance as counsel of record for the government. The “notice” was ineffective and improperly filed. Under the applicable court rules, “[a]n attorney may withdraw or be substituted for only on order of the court.” E.D. Mich. LR 83.25(b)(2). Moreover, before seeking any relief by filing a motion, “[t]he movant must ascertain whether the contemplated motion, or request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A), will be opposed.” E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a)(1). “If the movant obtains concurrence, the parties or other persons involved may make the subject matter of the contemplated motion or request a matter of record by stipulated order.” Ibid. Counsel in this instance made no effort to comply with the applicable court rules, and her filings purporting to withdraw her appearance therefore will be stricken.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the notice of withdrawal filed by attorney Susan K. DeClercq (ECF No. 399) is STRICKEN.


Summaries of

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. J.T. Battenberg

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 3, 2022
No. 06-14891 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. J.T. Battenberg

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. J.T…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

No. 06-14891 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 3, 2022)