From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Oxbo Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 17, 2024
3:22-cv-05228-TMC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 17, 2024)

Opinion

3:22-cv-05228-TMC

04-17-2024

UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; ENDURANCE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY; AGRICO SALES INC, Plaintiff, v. OXBO INC; OXBO ENGINEERING LLC, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY

Tiffany M. Cartwright, United States District Judge

Before the Court is Attorneys James McCurdy and James Molyneux-Elliot's motion to withdraw as counsel for third party defendant Alexander Gow, Inc. Dkt. 79. Motions to withdraw are ordinarily granted if filed at least sixty days before the discovery cutoff. Local Civil Rule 83.2(b)(1). District courts in the Ninth Circuit, including this one, consider the following factors in assessing motions to withdraw as counsel: (1) the reasons why withdrawal is sought; (2) the prejudice withdrawal may cause to other litigants; (3) the harm withdrawal might cause to the administration of justice; and (4) the degree to which withdrawal will delay the resolution of the case. Protingent, Inc. v. Gustafson-Feis, No. 2:20-cv-01551-TL, 2022 WL 2479124, at *1 (W.D. Wash. July 6, 2022); see also, e.g., Kessler v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 3:23-cv-05527-TMC, slip op. at 2 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 26, 2024). “District courts have discretion to approve or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel.” Protingent, 2022 WL 2479124, at *1 (citing McNall v. Pac. Ret. Servs., Inc., 859 Fed.Appx. 48, 49 (9th Cir. 2021)).

The discovery cutoff in this case was January 5, 2024 (Dkt. 70), and this motion was filed more than two months later, on March 19, 2024. Dkt. 79. Under Local Civil Rule 83.2(b)(1), there is a presumption against withdrawal at this late stage in the case. The motion does not address the above-cited factors or provide any reason why the Court should find the presumption against withdrawal is overcome.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion to withdraw, Dkt. 79, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If they so choose, Attorneys McCurdy and Molyneux-Elliot may file another motion to withdraw that addresses the factors set out above.

The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to any party appearing pro se at said party's last known address. The Clerk is also directed to mail uncertified copies of this Order to Alexander Gow, Inc. at the addresses provided in the motion to withdraw: 1900 W. Nickerson Street, Suite 306, Seattle, WA 98119-4223 and 5319 SW Westgate Dr., Suite 225, Portland, OR 97221.


Summaries of

United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Oxbo Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 17, 2024
3:22-cv-05228-TMC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 17, 2024)
Case details for

United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Oxbo Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; ENDURANCE AMERICAN INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Apr 17, 2024

Citations

3:22-cv-05228-TMC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 17, 2024)

Citing Cases

Kessler v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

After that period has passed, the local rule acts as a presumption against withdrawal. See United States Fire…