Opinion
2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW
04-25-2023
NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES, INC. Elizabeth S. Carmona Kristopher Pre Attorneys for Plaintiffs McDONALD CARANO LLP Rory T. Kay John A. Fortin Tara U. Teegarden Attorneys for Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC
NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES, INC. Elizabeth S. Carmona Kristopher Pre Attorneys for Plaintiffs
McDONALD CARANO LLP Rory T. Kay John A. Fortin Tara U. Teegarden Attorneys for Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR TMIF II PORTOLA, LLC TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR RELIEF [ECF 38]
[SECOND REQUEST]
Under Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC (“TMIF”) and Plaintiff Peggy Thornton (“Thornton”), by and through their attorneys, hereby agree, stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for TMIF to file the Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief (“Reply”) from April 27, 2023, up to and including May 25, 2023.
In support of this Stipulation, the parties state as follows:
1. On June 14, 2021, Thornton filed this action under seal in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, asserting a single claim for alleged violations of the False Claims Act. (ECF No. 1).
2. The parties thereafter agreed to extend the deadline for TMIF to respond to Thornton's Complaint from March 10, 2023 to March 24, 2023. (ECF No. 30).
3. On March 23, 2023, TMIF filed its Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief. (ECF No. 38).
4. On April 6, 2023, Thornton filed her Opposition to TMIF's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief (“Opposition”). (ECF No. 42).
5. On April 10, 2023, Thornton and defendant Apartment Management Consultants, LLC (“AMC”) stipulated to extend the deadline for AMC to file its responsive pleading. (ECF No. 44).
6. Under the April 10th stipulation, AMC and Plaintiff are discussing a potential global resolution of this matter. (See ECF No. 44).
7. TMIF's counsel thus needs additional time to discuss with TMIF about the possibility of a potential global resolution of this matter.
8. This is TMIF's second request to this Court for an extension of time to respond to Thornton's Opposition, the request is in good faith and not for the purposes of delay, and the requested extension will not prejudice any party.
9. The parties stipulate and request that the Court extend the deadline for TMIF to file its Reply from April 27, 2023, up to and including May 25, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.