Opinion
2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW
04-11-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. PEGGY THORNTON, Relator, and PEGGY THORNTON, Plaintiffs, v. PORTOLA DEL SOL OPERATOR, LLC, 14 a foreign limited-liability company; TMIF II PORTOLA, LLC, a foreign limited-15 liability company; APARTMENT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, LLC, 16 a foreign limited liability company, and RENE RICHARDSON, as AGENT of 17 PORTOLA DEL SOL OPERATOR, LLC., Defendants.
Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416), John A. Fortin (NSBN 15221), Tara U. Teegarden (NSBN 15344) McDONALD CARANO LLP, Attorneys for Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC. NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES, INC., Elizabeth S. Carmona (NSBN 14687), Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416), John A. Fortin (NSBN 15221), Tara U. Teegarden (NSBN 15344) McDONALD CARANO LLP, Attorneys for Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC.
NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES, INC., Elizabeth S. Carmona (NSBN 14687), Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR TMIF II PORTOLA, LLC TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR RELIEF [ECF 38]
Under Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC (“TMIF”) and Plaintiff Peggy Thornton (“Thornton”), by and through their attorneys, hereby agree, stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for TMIF to file the Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief (“Reply”) from April 13, 2023, up to and including April 27, 2023.
In support of this Stipulation, the parties state as follows:
1. On June 14, 2021, Thornton filed this action under seal in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, asserting a single claim for alleged violations of the False Claims Act. (ECF No. 1).
2. The parties thereafter agreed to extend the deadline for TMIF to respond to Thornton's Complaint from March 10, 2023 to March 24, 2023. (ECF No. 30).
3. On March 23, 2023, TMIF filed its Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief. (ECF No. 38).
4. On April 6, 2023, Thornton filed her Opposition to TMIF's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief (“Opposition”). (ECF No. 42).
5. In her Opposition, Thornton attached new documents in support of her Opposition. (ECF No. 42).
6. TMIF's counsel needs additional time to review and discuss Thornton's new documents with TMIF and prepare an appropriate response to Thornton's Opposition.
7. This is TMIF's first request to this Court for an extension of time to respond to Thornton's Opposition, the request is in good faith and not for the purposes of delay, and the requested extension will not prejudice any party.
8. The parties stipulate and request that the Court extend the deadline for TMIF to file its Reply from April 13, 2023, up to and including April 27, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.