From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States ex rel. Strom v. Scios, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 28, 2011
No. C 05-3004 CRB (JSC) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 05-3004 CRB (JSC)

10-28-2011

UNITED STATES ex rel. STROM, Plaintiffs, v. SCIOS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General JOSHUA B. EATON Attorney for the United States, Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. §515 By: SARA WINSLOW JULIE A. ARBUCKLE THOMAS R. GREEN Assistant United States Attorneys By: JOYCE R. BRANDA PATRICIA R. DAVIS RENEE S. ORLEANS KIMBERLY I. FRIDAY Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice Attorneys for the United States NOLAN & AUERBACH, P.A. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW PAVONE By: KENNETH J. NOLAN, Esq. MARCELLA AUERBACH, Esq. Pro Hac Vice MATTHEW B. PAVONE, Esq. Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiff Joe Strom QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By: CHRISTOPHER TAYBACK, Esq. ASHLEY MARTABANO, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants Scios, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Inc.


TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General

JOSHUA B. EATON (CA Bar No. 196887)

Attorney for the United States,

Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. §515

JOANN M. SWANSON (CA Bar No. 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

SARA WINSLOW (DC Bar No. 457643)

JULIE A. ARBUCKLE (CA Bar No. 193425)

THOMAS R. GREEN (CA Bar No. 203480)

Assistant United States Attorneys

JOYCE R. BRANDA

PATRICIA R. DAVIS

RENEE S. ORLEANS

KIMBERLY I. FRIDAY

Attorneys

Civil Division

United States Department of Justice

Attorneys for the United States of America

STIPULATION REGARDING THE UNITED STATES' REQUESTS FOR

PRODUCTION 109-111; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS Plaintiffs, the United States of America and Relator Joe Strom, and Defendants, Scios, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, (collectively the "Parties") through their undersigned counsel, have been continuing to meet and confer regarding the remaining discovery disputes in this case, including, but not limited to whether Defendants Scios, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson ("Defendants") should be required to produce certain financial documents in response to the United States' Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 109, 110, and 111.

WHEREAS on October 24, 2011, the Parties reached an agreement regarding these Requests for Production of Documents and which documents Defendants will produce in response to the Requests.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, that:

(1) Defendants agree that all of the documents that have been produced or that may be produced pursuant to the Parties' October 24, 2011 agreement are authentic pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 901 in that they are what they purport to be, and that they will not challenge the authenticity of such documents in this action.

(2) All of the document productions that may be made pursuant to the Parties' October 24, 2011 agreement will be made as soon as possible, and no later than December 1, 2011. If any additional discovery issues arise regarding the productions pursuant to the Parties' October 24, 2011 agreement, the United States shall have three weeks after the date all productions are complete to meet and confer with Defendants regarding such issues and to provide its portion of any joint discovery letter(s) to the Court relating to such issues. Defendants will then have seven days to provide their responsive portion, and the parties will have an additional seven days to make any final revisions and file the joint letter(s).

(3) Based on the foregoing, the United States will not file the joint letter it sent Defendants regarding the discovery dispute described above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General

JOSHUA B. EATON

Attorney for the United States, Acting

Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. §515

By: SARA WINSLOW

JULIE A. ARBUCKLE

THOMAS R. GREEN

Assistant United States Attorneys

By: JOYCE R. BRANDA

PATRICIA R. DAVIS

RENEE S. ORLEANS

KIMBERLY I. FRIDAY

Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice

Attorneys for the United States

NOLAN & AUERBACH, P.A.

LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW PAVONE

By: KENNETH J. NOLAN, Esq.

MARCELLA AUERBACH, Esq.

Pro Hac Vice

MATTHEW B. PAVONE, Esq.

Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiff Joe Strom

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By: CHRISTOPHER TAYBACK, Esq.

ASHLEY MARTABANO, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants Scios, Inc. and

Johnson & Johnson Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States ex rel. Strom v. Scios, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 28, 2011
No. C 05-3004 CRB (JSC) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States ex rel. Strom v. Scios, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES ex rel. STROM, Plaintiffs, v. SCIOS, INC. and JOHNSON …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No. C 05-3004 CRB (JSC) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)