From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States ex rel. Roe v. Stanford Healthcare Billing Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 14, 2020
CV 17-8726 DSF (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2020)

Opinion

CV 17-8726 DSF (AFMx)

07-14-2020

UNITED STATES ex rel, EMILY ROE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. STANFORD HEALTHCARE BILLING DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The Court having granted a motion to dismiss without leave to amend,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Relator take nothing, that the action be dismissed with prejudice as to Relator and without prejudice to the United States and the State of California, and that Defendant recover costs of suit from Relator pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Date: July 14, 2020

/s/_________

Dale S. Fischer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States ex rel. Roe v. Stanford Healthcare Billing Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 14, 2020
CV 17-8726 DSF (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2020)
Case details for

United States ex rel. Roe v. Stanford Healthcare Billing Dep't

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES ex rel, EMILY ROE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. STANFORD HEALTHCARE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 14, 2020

Citations

CV 17-8726 DSF (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2020)