From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States ex rel. Prince v. Va. Res. Auth.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 13, 2015
593 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-1690

02-13-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. MARK W. PRINCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY, Defendant - Appellee, and SHENANDOAH COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; SUNTRUST BANK; SUNTRUST EQUIPMENT FINANCE & LEASING CORPORATION, Defendants.

Bradley Glenn Pollack, Woodstock, Virginia, for Appellant. Jeffrey M. Summers, THE LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY M. SUMMERS, PLLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00045-MFU) Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bradley Glenn Pollack, Woodstock, Virginia, for Appellant. Jeffrey M. Summers, THE LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY M. SUMMERS, PLLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark W. Prince appeals the district court's orders dismissing his qui tam action against Virginia Resources Authority and others under the False Claims Act, see 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)-3733 et seq. (2012), and denying Prince's motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the arguments on appeal and the record, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States ex rel. Prince v. Va. Res. Auth., No. 5:13-cv-00045-MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2014; July 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States ex rel. Prince v. Va. Res. Auth.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 13, 2015
593 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States ex rel. Prince v. Va. Res. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. MARK W. PRINCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 13, 2015

Citations

593 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Balderas v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

{25} Similarly, courts have dismissed a complaint with prejudice to the relator, but without prejudice to the…

State ex rel. Balderas v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

{25} Similarly, courts have dismissed a complaint with prejudice to the relator, but without prejudice to the…