From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States ex rel. Evans v. S. Cal. Intergovernmental Training & Dev. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 23, 2020
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD

07-23-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. TAMARA EVANS, Plaintiff/Relator, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, and DOES 1-10, Defendant(s).

Steven E. Boehmer, Esq. (#144817) John E. Petze, Esq. (#118573) McDOUGAL LOVE BOEHMER FOLEY LYON & CANLAS 8100 La Mesa Blvd., Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91942 Telephone: (619) 440-4444 Facsimile: (619) 440-4907 Attorneys for Defendant, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER


Steven E. Boehmer, Esq. (#144817)
John E. Petze, Esq. (#118573)
McDOUGAL LOVE BOEHMER
FOLEY LYON & CANLAS
8100 La Mesa Blvd., Suite 200
La Mesa, California 91942
Telephone: (619) 440-4444
Facsimile: (619) 440-4907 Attorneys for Defendant, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND
DEVELOPMENT CENTER EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6103 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. Complaint Filed: March 19, 2015
Trial Date: None

Presently before the Court is an Ex Parte Motion (ECF No. 77), filed on behalf of Defendant CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER ("RTC"), to exceed the Court's page limitation of twenty (20) pages for RTC's memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment, and to be allowed up to sixty-five (65) pages for its memorandum of points and authorities. The Court has read and considered both the Motion as well as Plaintiff's Opposition and Defendant's Reply thereto. /// /// ///

Good cause appearing therefor, Defendant's Motion (ECF No. 77) is GRANTED. RTC may file a memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment not to exceed forty (40) pages. Any opposition also shall not exceed forty (40) pages and any reply shall not exceed twenty (20) pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2020

/s/_________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States ex rel. Evans v. S. Cal. Intergovernmental Training & Dev. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 23, 2020
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2020)
Case details for

United States ex rel. Evans v. S. Cal. Intergovernmental Training & Dev. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. TAMARA EVANS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 23, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2020)