From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Bill Davis Racing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Sep 11, 2012
1:11CV141 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 11, 2012)

Opinion

1:11CV141

09-11-2012

UNITED STATES AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. BILL DAVIS RACING, INC., Defendant/Counter-Claimant, RENAISSANCE AIR, LLC, and BANCORPSOUTH BANK, Defendants.


ORDER

On August 24, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636.

Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 45) is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 19) is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that Plaintiff seeks dismissal of Defendant BDR's counterclaims for bad faith refusal to settle and unfair and deceptive trade practices, and that those counterclaims are DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 19) is DENIED in all other respects, without prejudice to Plaintiff raising its contentions as part of a Motion for Summary Judgment after the close of the discovery period that has been set by the court.

Thomas D. Schroeder

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Bill Davis Racing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Sep 11, 2012
1:11CV141 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 11, 2012)
Case details for

United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Bill Davis Racing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Sep 11, 2012

Citations

1:11CV141 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 11, 2012)