Opinion
1:21-cv-00113-NONE-JLT
06-28-2021
UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FBT, INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEFAULT ENTERED AGAINST ANM LOGISTICS SHOULD NOT BE SET ASIDE
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
The Court ordered the plaintiff to seek default judgment against Neeshu Sharma and ANM Logistics (Doc. 34), after the Clerk entered default as to these defendants (Docs. 23, 30.) Now, the plaintiff seeks an extension of 60 days to file the motion for default judgment because it believes service was not properly completed as to ANM Logistics (Doc. 35) The plaintiff file a motion to serve the entity by publication. Id. at 2. Thus, this begs the question whether the default against ANM Logistics should be set aside. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:
1. Within 14 days, the plaintiff SHALL show cause why the default entered against ANM Logistics should not be set aside.
IT IS SO ORDERED.