From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Specialty Ins. Co. v. E-Cig Vapor Emporium, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2018
Case No. EDCV 18-00002 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 18-00002 JGB (SHKx)

10-15-2018

United Specialty Insurance Company Plaintiffs, v. E-Cig Vapor Emporium, LLC, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to the Order filed concurrent herewith, the Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff United Specialty Insurance Company ("USIC") is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's First, Second, and Fourth Causes of Action. The Court declares the following:

(1) that USIC owes no obligation to defend E-Cig Vapor Emporium, LLC ("E-Cig") in the lawsuit filed in Riverside County Superior Court entitled Robert Sean Lockyer v. E-Cig Vapor Emporium, LLC, case number PSC1704348 ("Underlying Action");

(2) that USIC owes no obligation to indemnify E-Cig in the Underlying Action; and

(3) that USIC is entitlted to reimbursement from E-Cig for costs incurred to defend it in the underlying action.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of USIC and against E-Cig on the first, second, and fourth causes of action for declaratory relief. Dated: October 15, 2018

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United Specialty Ins. Co. v. E-Cig Vapor Emporium, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2018
Case No. EDCV 18-00002 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2018)
Case details for

United Specialty Ins. Co. v. E-Cig Vapor Emporium, LLC

Case Details

Full title:United Specialty Insurance Company Plaintiffs, v. E-Cig Vapor Emporium…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 15, 2018

Citations

Case No. EDCV 18-00002 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2018)

Citing Cases

Hous. Cas. Co. v. Cibus U.S. LLC

“Because of the ‘hefty premiums' charged for ‘products-completed operations hazard' coverage, among other…

Atain Specialty Ins. Co. v. Todd

This is not a reasonable interpretation of the language of the contract, and, as such, any expectations based…