United Rys. Co. v. Rosik

1 Citing case

  1. Transit Company v. Metz

    158 Md. 424 (Md. 1930)   Cited 41 times
    In Transit Company v. Metz, 158 Md. 424, 453, 149 A. 4, (1930) appeal dismissed, 282 U.S. 801, 51 S.Ct. 40, 75 L.Ed. 720 (1929), the Court held that evidence of the manner in which a truck was driven when it passed a detour about 1,000 yards from the place of the accident was properly excluded.

    The second, or B prayer, properly granted, defines the duty of a carrier to a passenger, as approved in Phila. W. B.R. Co. v. Anderson, 72 Md. 519; United Rwys. Elec. Co. v. Hertel, 97 Md. 382, 395; United Rwys. Elec. Co. v. Rosek, 107 Md. 138, 143. The plaintiff's C prayer is the one to which the transit company most seriously objects, and that is to the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to the facts in this case.