From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 23, 1953
205 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1953)

Opinion

Nos. 285, 286, Docket 22740-22741.

Argued June 4, 1953.

Decided June 23, 1953.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward A. Conger, Judge.

From an order vacating temporary restraining orders, denying a preliminary injunction, and dismissing a complaint against William Wyer, Trustee, et al., for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and from a similar order in an action against The New York, New Haven Hartford Railroad Company, et al., the plaintiffs have taken companion appeals.

Maurice R. Whitebook, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants United Railroad Operating Crafts et al.

Richard R. Bongartz, New York City, William F. McNulty and William J. O'Brien, New York City, of counsel, for defendant-appellee, William Wyer, as trustee of Long Island R. Co.

Polier Midonick, — Shad Polier, Millard L. Midonick and David Bromberg, New York City, Clifford D. O'Brien and Ruth Weyand, Chicago, Ill., and Harold C. Heiss, and Russell B. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for defendants-appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and for Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers.

Bernard L. Alderman, New York City, for intervenor-appellee, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen.

Edward R. Brumley, New York City, for defendant-appellee, New York, N.H. H.R. Co.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


The orders are affirmed on the opinion of the District Court in United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer, Trustee, 115 F. Supp. ___.


Summaries of

United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 23, 1953
205 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1953)
Case details for

United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, A Railroad Labor Organization National…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 1953

Citations

205 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1953)

Citing Cases

Rychlik v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

The plaintiff raises two objections to the award of the "System Board": (1) it had no jurisdiction over…

Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Rychlik

The briefs below show that the validity of this premise was not challenged by any of the parties before the…