From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Nat. Insur. Co. v. J.H. France Refract. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 4, 1999
558 Pa. 409 (Pa. 1999)

Opinion

October 4, 1999.

Application for Reconsideration of Denial of Allowance of Appeal, No. 154 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1998.

Mark D. Turetsky, Morristown, for petitioner.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 4th day of October 1999, the Application for Reconsideration of Denial of Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Order of the Superior Court is vacated and the matter is remanded to Superior Court is vacated and the matter is remanded to Superior Court for further proceedings, including remand to the common pleas court for evidentiary hearings if necessary, to determine the responsibility for the absence of transcripts from the record certified for appeal. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to the failure of Petitioner/Appellants to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the judgment of the Superior Court shall be reinstated. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to court personnel, Superior Court shall resolve on the merits the issues raised in the appeal, which were previously treated as waived. Cf. Commonwealth v. Williams, 552 Pa. 451, 715 A.2d 1101 (1998). Jurisdiction relinquished.


Summaries of

United Nat. Insur. Co. v. J.H. France Refract. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 4, 1999
558 Pa. 409 (Pa. 1999)
Case details for

United Nat. Insur. Co. v. J.H. France Refract. Co.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent v. J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 4, 1999

Citations

558 Pa. 409 (Pa. 1999)
737 A.2d 738

Citing Cases

Papach v. Mercy Suburban Hosp

¶ 6 Even if we could conclude on this record that the fault lies with court personnel and not with Appellant,…

Papach v. Mercy

PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2007, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED,…