From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Heritage Property Casualty Company v. Pietri

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 15, 2007
Civil No. 07-460-JE (D. Or. Oct. 15, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-460-JE.

October 15, 2007


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Jelderks has issued a Findings and Recommendation [11] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommended that defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [4] be granted. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to me.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. United States Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation [11] is ADOPTED. Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [4] is GRANTED, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United Heritage Property Casualty Company v. Pietri

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 15, 2007
Civil No. 07-460-JE (D. Or. Oct. 15, 2007)
Case details for

United Heritage Property Casualty Company v. Pietri

Case Details

Full title:UNITED HERITAGE PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY. Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH R. PIETRI…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Oct 15, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 07-460-JE (D. Or. Oct. 15, 2007)